Now intransitive verbs are the opposite.

不及物动词正的。

'Lie' is an intransitive verb and it has no object.

lie 不及物动词，没有宾语。

" Go off" is what we call an intransitive verb.

go off我们所的不及物动词短语。

It can also be intransitive which means that it does not take a direct object.

也可以不及物动词，这意味着不带直接宾语。

On the other hand, " rise" is intransitive. It is never followed by a direct object.

而“rise”不及物动词，后面不能直接跟宾语。

That means, in sentences, we cannot separate them with other words.

也，在句子中，我们无法在不及物动词短语中间插入其他词。

So, " mitigate" is not necessarily a transitive verb, but it can be a transitive verb. Okay?

所以" mitigate" 可以个不及物动词，也可以个及物动词。吧？

English speakers do not generally use intransitive verbs, verbs that do not take an object, in the passive voice.

英语母语人士一般不使用不及物动词，即不带宾语的动词。

The short answer is that " raise" is a transitive verb and " rise" is intransitive.

简单来，“raise”及物动词，“rise”不及物动词。

Intransitive verbs, such as " go off, " do not have a direct object.

不及物动词短语没有直接宾语的，如" go off" 。

On the other hand, " rise" is intransitive.

另一方面，" rise" 不及物动词。

Now this phrasal verb is intransitive and therefore it's also inseparable right?

这个短语动词不及物动词，因此也不可分割的，对吧？

" Eat" is intransitive, which means we do not have to say it.

" Eat" 不及物动词，也我们不必吃了什么或者要吃什么。

So, " lie" is an intransitive verb.

所以，“谎言”一个不及物动词。

So, this is an issue of a transitive verb vs. an intransitive verb.

所以，这及物动词与不及物动词的问题。

An intransitive verb means it doesn't take a direct object. Huh?

不及物动词意味着不带直接宾语。 嗯？

" Intransitive" , this means these phrasal verbs do not have objects.

“不及物动词” ，这意味着这些短语动词没有宾语。

One feature of intransitive verbs is that they do not require a complement.

不及物动词的一个特点不需要补语（complement）。

You can see that every single line uses an intransitive verb paired with a prepositional phrase.

你可以看到每一行都使用了一个不及物动词和一个介词短语。

" arise" is an intransitive verb. All right? You don't need to have an object with it.

“arise” 一个不及物动词。 的？ 你不需要有一个对象。