We know that monolinguals, around 18 months, they use mutual exclusivity, which is a strategy in which they are mapping a novel word to a novel object.
Well, maybe we can, there are whatever these four different modes of fellow feeling, one of which ends up being sort of more authentic, but it would also not be the case that they're always exclusive, right?
You have a problem that you have to worry then in your library, you have to implement your own distributed locking and mutex with, you know, in case you have timeouts and zombie processes and so on.
And is it possible that those are mutually exclusive up until a certain point, like your definition of happiness now, so the things that you're enjoying right now might not be in sync with your why?
All right, two caveats, because would this be a Taylor Bell video if I didn't at least attempt to give you a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive argument?
The self masking or owl ear hypothesis, and the stealth or mouse ear hypothesis as they are not mutually exclusive, and some owl species both make sense.