That is as far as we can go This is called the concept of model dependent reality.

这就是我们目前所知道的即我们所能建立的模型中 这种概念就称为模态实在论。

For Sellers, and for his later followers, the answer is what he calls critical realism.

对塞拉斯及其后来的追随者而言，答案就是他所谓的批判实在论。

So he did not make the phenomenological move of let's set aside the realism versus idealism distinction.

因此，他并未的方法，即暂时搁置实在论与唯心论的区分。

So the alternative to foundationalism Sella's called critical realism.

所以塞拉斯提出的替代基础主义的方案是批判实在论。

It's particularly wary of science, or of the idea that science can tell us the truth about the external world, the view that's sometimes called scientific realism.

它特别对科持谨慎态度，或者对科能够告诉我们关于外部世界真相的想法持谨慎态度，这种观点有时被称为科实在论。

Whereas then when we perform the reduction, we are placing the whole realism versus idealism debate In abeyance, we're just gonna consider the pure appearances without regard to their ultimate metaphysical status.

然而， 当我们进行还原时，我们暂且搁置了整个实在论与唯心论的争论，仅关注纯粹的， 而不考虑其最终的形而上地位。

Yes, I think initially what Continental philosophers saw in Sellars was that because there was a recent turn in Continental philosophy, the speculative turn towards a realist stance on the existence of the world.

是的， 我认为起初欧陆哲家在塞拉斯身上看到的是， 由于欧陆哲近期发生了转向，即朝向对世界存在实在论立场的思辨转向。