Yes, and there's a secondary stress on “on”.

是，次在“ on ”。

Lee, it's a secondary stress so it's going to be a little longer than the previous two syllables, the two schwas, literally, ta da ta ta, literally.

/Lee/是次，所以它会比之前两个微长一点。

But Lucy also used the same word as a verb. Listen to this clip. Where does the stress fall this time?

但是露西也把这个词用作动词。听听这个片段。这次落在哪里？

This is a five syllable word with stress on  the fourth syllable. We have secondary stress on the second syllable, but in general, you  can feel that as unstressed. Administration.

这是一个五个单词， 在四个上。 我们在二个上有次，但一般来说， 您会觉得它没有。 行政。

Secondary stress is shown by a lowered mark, so the greater stress is on this third syllable.

次用一个降低标记表示，所以更大在这个三个上。

In the word epiphenomenal, for example, the primary stress falls on -no - while the secondary stress is on epi -.

长词经常有两个，其中一个相对更，叫主，前面用 ['] 表示；相对弱是次，前面用 [。] 表示。例如，epiphe'nomenal (副现象) 一词主落在 - no - 上，而次落在 epi - 上，其他是非。

I also include secondary stress when appropriate.

我也在适当时候标注次。

It's between secondary and schwa, right?

是在次和轻之间，对吧？

But if you can reduce it, then Potentially, it's a schwa because secondary stresses, when you reduce them, it just doesn't sound right if you know the word.

但如果能将其简化，那么很可能是中性元， 因为次在简化时，若你熟悉该词， 听起来就会不自然。

If you don't fully pronounce a secondary stress, it will affect the clarity of the word, right?

如果不充分发次，会影响单词清晰度，对吧？

Junlin is asking, how do I identify if there is a secondary stress in a long word such as congratulations?

Junlin问到，如何识别像“congratulations”这样长单词中是否存在次？

How do you identify between the primary and the secondary?

如何区分主和次？

So, for example, if we take the second syllable, graa, that has the as in cat, which means it's a secondary stress, if we try to reduce it, say it to yourself with a schwa.

因此，举例来说，如果我们取二个“graa”，它含有如“cat” 中/a/， 这意味着它是一个次。如果我们尝试将其弱化， 用schwa来发这个， 请你自己试着发一下。

First of all, the way I define a secondary stress is really a word, a syllable that has a pure vowel.

首先， 我定义次方式是指一个词或，它含有纯元， 但并非主。

Not that easy to hear the nuance between primary and secondary stress.

区分主和次之间细微差别并非易事。

Is it a secondary stress or can we reduce it?

它是次还是我们可以将其弱化？

There is something about the rhythm of English, it's not always the case, but you probably won't find a lot of secondary stresses or a lot of pure vowels and a primary stress, right?

英语奏有一些特点，虽然并非总是如此， 但你可能不会发现有很多次或很多纯元和主要，对吧？

Now, we want to ask ourselves what syllables are reduced and what have pure vowels, and those are the secondary stresses.

现在， 我们需要自问：哪些被弱化， 哪些保留了纯元，这些保留纯元即为次。