The notions of Dryden were formed by comprehensive speculation, those of Pope by minute attention.

德莱登观念源于综合推断，而蒲伯观念成因于细微观察。

Today I have an interview with the Dryden academy.

今天我要去德莱顿学院进行一场面试。

Dryden obeys the motions of his own mind; Pope constrains his mind to his own rules of composition.

德莱登恪守自己内心活动，而蒲伯则将内心活动置于自己创作原则之下。

There is more dignity in the knowledge of Dryden, more certainty in that of Pope.

德莱登认识体系更严谨，要比蒲伯认识带有更多确定性。

If, of Dryden's fire, the blaze is brighter, of Pope's the heat is more regular and constant.

如果说德莱登绽放出火焰更明亮话，那么蒲伯所散发出炽热更有规律、更持久。

If the flights of Dryden are higher, Pope continues longer on the wing.

如果说德莱登能飞得更高话，那么蒲伯更注重是翅膀能扑扇得更久。

He's a simpleton, is what my more than 100-year-old Dryden translation calls him.

在我那超过百年德莱顿译本中，他被称为一个“傻瓜”。

Unfortunately, Dryden's artificial rule only created confusion in the language.

不幸是，德赖登人造规则只给语言带来了混乱。

There was a volume of Pope, with the Rape of the Lock in it, and another of the Tatler, and an odd one of Dryden's Miscellanies, all with tarnished gilding on their covers, and thoughts of tarnished brilliancy inside.

还有另一本《闲谈家》， 还有一本奇怪德莱顿杂记， 封面上镀金都失去了光泽， 里面思想也失去了光泽。

Because of this, Samuel Johnson, who followed Dryden, applied the term" metaphysical" to Donne and others in derogation of their excessive use of philosophy and deliberate show-off of their cleverness and learning.

正因为如此，追随德莱顿塞缪尔·约翰逊 （Samuel Johnson） 将“形而上学”一词用于多恩等人，以贬低他们对哲学过度使用和故意炫耀他们聪明才智和学识。

To bring this prose to perfection (and Dryden's prose is very near perfection) only the discipline of the stage was necessary and the growth of self-consciousness.

为了使这篇散达到完美（德莱顿散非常接近完美），只需要舞台纪律和自我意识成长。

And interestingly, when Dryden formulated that rule in 1672, he specifically cited a line in a play by Ben Johnson which he found objectionable.

有趣是， 当德赖登在1672年制定那条规则时，他特别引用了本·琼森一部戏剧中一个句子， 他认为那个句子令人反感。

Later, Henryson, Shakespeare and Dryden also took the subject and rewrote it.

后来，亨利森、莎士比亚和德莱顿也接受了这个主题并重写了它。

And since you can't end a sentence with a preposition in Latin, Dryden apparently thought English should follow the same rule.

既然在拉丁语中不能以介词结尾来结束句子，德莱顿显然认为英语也应该遵循同样规则。

Jim Dryden of member station KWMU in St. Louis reports.

下面请听我台记者吉姆·屈莱顿从圣路易斯下属县城为您发回报道。