How do we find the Nash Equilibrium?

我如何找到衡？

Okay, it's someone named Martin Nash. Yeah!

好吧, 这是一个叫马丁·的人。 是的!

What are the Nash Equilibria in this game?

这个博弈中的衡是么？

Yeah, what are the Nash Equilibria in this game?

是啊，这个游戏的衡是么？

The Nash Equilibrium is as follows.

衡如下。

Now, this gives us one more motivation for a Nash Equilibrium.

现在，这为我寻求衡提供了另一个动机。

Suppose a strategy isn't, suppose strategy (S, S) is not a Nash Equilibrium.

假设一个策略不是，假设策略 (S, S) 不是衡。

Let's try and find out the Nash Equilibrium of this game.

让我找出这场游戏的衡。

So, in particular, it can't be a best response to the thing being played in the Nash Equilibrium.

所以，具体来说，它不能成为对衡中正在发生的事情的最佳回应。

And do you want a special memorial service in the Nash Church opposite Broadcasting House or has that faded now?

你是否希望在广播大楼对面的教堂举行一场特别的纪念仪式？还是说现在这种想法已经淡去了？

We solved for the Nash Equilibrium in the sub-game.

我在子游戏中求解了衡。

So, what are the Nash Equilibria in this game?

那么，这个博弈中的衡是么？

We need to take this Nash Equilibrium we've just found, which is a Nash Equilibrium in the second sub-game.

我需要利用刚刚找到的这个衡，它是在第二个子游戏中的衡。

So the Nash Equilibrium in this game is quit 1, fight 2.

因此，这场博弈的衡是：我方选择退出1，对方选择战斗2。

So the Nash Equilibria in this game are what?

那么, 这个游戏中的衡是么呢?

The Nash Equilibrium (Dd, R) corresponds to the one we found by backward induction.

衡 (Dd, R) 与我通过逆向归法发现的衡相对应。

So our idea is find the Nash Equilibrium in the second period of the game and roll back these possible payoffs.

我的思路是在游戏的第二阶段寻找衡，并回溯这些可能的收益。

So that's actually a very good proof that proves that no strictly dominated strategy could ever be played in a Nash Equilibrium.

所以这实际上是一个很好的证明，证明了在衡中不可能实现任何严格支配的策略。

So to find the Nash Equilibrium we're going to have to find best responses.

所以为了找到衡，我必须找到最佳反应。

So Beatrice won this election, is this array a Nash Equilibrium?

那么比阿特丽斯赢得了这次选举，这个阵列是衡吗？