Even worse, if you summed up the contributions of higher and higher frequencies to calculate the total power emitted by a blackbody, the Rayleigh-Jeans law predicted that you’d find infinite power.

更糟糕的是，如果你将越越高频率的贡献加起，以计算黑体发出的总功率，瑞利-金斯定律预测你会发现功率是无穷大的。

In contrast, Webb's results are almost perfectly  consistent with a blackbody made of bare rock and no atmosphere to circulate the heat.

相比之下，韦布的结果几乎完全裸露岩石构成且没有大气循环热量的黑体。

One paper suggests a blanet like Miller would be completely surrounded  by a 6,000-degree blackbody radiation field.

篇论文指出，像米勒星这样的行星会被个6000度的黑体辐射场完全包围。

No true blackbodies exist, but in theory, they absorb all incoming light without reflecting any, and radiate energy accordingly.

没有黑色物体，但理论上它们会吸收所有落在它们身上的光而不反射任何东西，并相应地辐射能量。

Instead, experiments showed that blackbodies had a peak intensity, based on their temperature.

相反，实验表明，黑体辐射的强度具有与温度相关的峰值。

Now, there’s this thing called a blackbody, which is basically the idealized version of a radiating object.

现在，有个叫做黑体的东西，它基本上是辐射物体的理想化版本。

If you take Planck’s law into account when you try to predict the intensity of blackbody radiation, you end up with an equation that predicts the experimental results perfectly, including those weird peak intensities.

如果你在预测黑体辐射强度时考虑普朗克定律，最终你会得到个能完美预测实验结果的方程， 包括那些奇怪的峰值强度。

Not all of the energy coming from a blackbody has the same intensity.

并非所有自黑体的能量都具有相同的强度。

Now, there's this thing called a blackbody, which is basically the idealized version of a radiating object.

黑体基本上是放射性物体的理想形式。

You can predict the intensity of the energy coming from a blackbody – or blackbody radiation – based on its temperature.

您可以根据其温度预测自黑体或黑体辐射的能量。