So the illocutionary act is what Austin really driving at.

在这个意义上，语行理论实际上就是行事行理论。

But illocutionary act cannot be translated as yanwaizhiyi, since the prefix -il, as we have made clear, means " in, within, " not " not."

不过illocutionaryact不能翻译成“意”，因这个-il意思是“内”，而不是“非”。

This brings up another difference between the illocutionary act and the perlocutionary act, i.e. one is related to the speaker's intention and the other not.

这是行事行跟取效行另一点不同，者与说话人意图有关，而后者与此无关。

In this general theory then, which applies to all sentences, the original performatives are only a special type in which the illocutionary force is made explicit by the performative verb.

在这个概括性更强理论适用于所有句子。

The statement " to say is to do" means that when we utter certain utterances, we are actually using language to undertake actions such as " warning, promise, greeting, order, naming, etc." , that is, illocutionary force

“说即做”是指当我们说出某种话语时，实际上是在用语进行“警告、承诺、问候、命令、点名等”等动作，即力。