Rorschach inkblot tests have basically no validity when it comes to diagnosing people's personality and are not used by modern-day psychologists.

Rorschach墨迹测试 在判断人的性格时 并不是很可靠，也并没有被现代心理学家采纳。

To probe a patient's problem, Freud used tools such as Rorschach inkblots, in which he analysed a patient's perception of inkblot patterns, and free association of words, as well as dream analysis.

为了探究患者的问题， 弗洛伊德采用了诸如罗夏墨迹测试的工具，通过分析患者对墨迹图案的感知，以及词语自由联想和梦境解析等方法。

There are people who have been kind enough to put on the web these inkblots, including the right answers to them.

还有一些好心人把这些墨迹块放在了网上，包括正确的答案。

Like, there was no way to really quantify someone's inkblot response, or how orally fixated they might be.

就像，没有办法真正量化某人的墨迹反应，或者他们的口腔固定程度。

He later devised the inkblot test, whereby responses to specific blots may reveal emotional, character, and thought disorders.

他后来设计了墨迹测试，通过人们对特定墨迹的反应，可能揭示其情感、性格和思维障碍。

He devoted his entire life to the inkblot test.

他将他的一生都致力于墨迹图测试。

Did the color on some inkblots help them give better answers, or distract and overwhelm them?

某些墨迹中的颜色是否帮助他们给出了更好的答案，还是分散了注意力，使他们感到不知所措？

When's an inkblot not an inkblot?

墨迹什么时候不是墨迹？

And all these theories, all the years of research, and cigar smoking, and inkblot gazing, and the fans debating whether they're more of a Luke or a Leia, they're all funneling down to one big central question.

所有这些理论、多年的研究、抽雪茄、凝视墨迹，以及粉丝们争论他们更像是卢克还是莱娅， 他们都集中在一个的核心问题上。

For nearly a century, ten inkblots like these have been used as what seems like an almost mystical personality test.

近一个世纪以来，像这样的十张墨迹图被用作一种看似神秘的人格测试。

Hermann Rorschach, 1884 to 1922. As a Swiss schoolboy, Rorschach was called Klake, inkblot, because he was always drawing.

赫尔曼·罗夏，1884年至1922年。作为瑞士的一名学童，罗夏因其总是画画而被称为“克拉克”（墨迹）。

This is, in black and white form, a version of the Rorschach test, the Rorschach inkblot test.

这是一个以黑白形式呈现的版式，它是罗夏克测试， 即罗夏克墨迹测试的一种版本。