Every law passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be presumptively unconstitutional.

在1965年《投票权利法》之前通的每法都应被视为违宪。

So every law before 1965 is presumptively unconstitutional.

因此，1965年之前的每法都被推定为违宪。

My premises for the book is that every law passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be presumptively unconstitutional, right?

我写这本书的前提是， 1965年《投票权法》通之前的所有法都应被推定为违宪，对吧？

One of my premises for the book is that every law passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be presumptively unconstitutional, right?

我这本书的个前提是， 1965年《投票权法案》之前通的每法都应推定为违宪，对吗？

Nevertheless, this appeals court has now presumptively disenfranchised over 60,000 voters, telling them that their votes will not count unless they can re-prove their eligibility.

然而， 这上诉法院现在推定剥夺了超6选民的选举权，告知他们除非能够重新证明自己的选举资格， 否则他们的选票将不被计入。

Now, is Trump's latest threat really the road he wants to travel to strip tax-exempt status I mean, presumptively, this is because he doesn't like Harvard, but I guess he's claiming that there's political activity involved.

那么， 特朗普最新的威胁真的是他想要采取的途径来剥夺税收豁免地位吗？我的意思是， 假设这是因为不喜欢哈佛，但我想他声称其中涉及政治活动。

And you're right, that for several decades, that was a view that vertical mergers in particular, or mergers between companies that are adjacent in a supply chain, there was a view that those were presumptively legal and maybe even competitively benign.

你说得对，在去几十年里，确实存在种观点，认为垂直合并，或者供应链中相邻公司的合并，通常是合法的，甚至可能对竞争无害。