How does Stockfish break these age old principles?

Stockfish 如何打破这些古老的原则？

And of course, if you compare him to like Garry Kasparov, He plays most like Stockfish, but Garry Kasparov, at his time, he beat more players of his skill level than Magnus did, and Magnus loses more often.

当然， 如果将他与加里·卡斯帕罗夫相比，他的棋风最接近于Stockfish（一款国际象棋软件），但在他那个时代， 卡斯帕罗夫击败了比卡尔的等水平选手，而卡尔输棋的次数则。

And it's one of those openings that computers really don't like because you do, or at least Stockfish doesn't like it.

这种开局是电脑真的不喜的， 因为你会，或者至少斯托克菲什不喜它。

Oh, so wait, so Stockfish or the engine would agree with Gary's intuition?

哦，所以等等，Stockfish或者引擎会赞Gary的直觉吗？

I cannot predict exactly how a conflict between humanity and a smarter AI would go for the same reason I can't predict exactly how you would lose a chess game to one of the current top AI chess programs, let's say Stockfish.

我无法预测人类与智慧的 AI 之间的冲突会如何发，，我也无法预测你到底会如何在一盘国际象棋中输给当今最顶尖的 AI 国际象棋程序，比如 Stockfish。

Anyway, now that I know a little bit more about Stockfish, I'm gonna go have my rematch.

不管怎，现在我对 Stockfish 有了的了解，我要继续下棋了。

Let's see which opening Stockfish plays and it responded Knight to F6.

让我们看看 Stockfish 选择什么开局，它把马走到 F6。

I can't predict exactly how you'll lose to Stockfish, but I can predict who wins the game.

我无法预测你会具体如何输给 Stockfish，但我可以预测谁会赢。

I wanna find out a little bit more about how Stockfish thinks so I can use its tricks to beat other humans.

我想地了解 Stockfish 是如何思考的，这我就可以用它的技巧打败其他人类。

If I could predict exactly where Stockfish could move, I could play chess that well myself.

如果我可以预测出 Stockfish 的每一步棋，我自己也能下一手好棋。

Is there any difference in the way that Stockfish approaches the endgame versus the middlegame or the opening?

Stockfish 处理局终的方式与中局或开局的方式有什么不吗？

So in my middle game against Stockfish, Pawn to C4 is what I played.

所以在我对 Stockfish 的中局，我把兵走到 C4。

What Stockfish can do is look forward into the table bases and every path to the table bases.

Stockfish 能做的是查看残局数据库往后的走法和残局数据库的每一条路径。

So again, this is why it's so counterintuitive and Stockfish doesn't like it.

因此，这正是为何如此反直觉，连Stockfish也不喜这的走法。

Stockfish actually only looks at about two moves per position and that's what's called the alpha beta search technique, which is what Stockfish and most other engines are built on top of.

Stockfish 实际上只关注每个局面的大约两步，这就是所谓的 alpha beta 搜索技术，这也是 Stockfish 和大数其他引擎所建立的基础。

Stockfish is only good at one thing and it's super good at that one thing, which is playing chess.

Stockfish 只擅长一件事，而且非常擅长那一件事，那就是下棋。

I'm using an earlier version of Stockfish.

我使用的是Stockfish的一个较早版本。

How does Stockfish know which of those to scrub and ultimately decide on one, if three or four look really, really good?

Stockfish 如何知道要排除哪一个，并最终做出决定，如果有三种或四种走法看起来非常非常好？