A type-F monist may have one of a number of attitudes to the zombie argument against materialism.
【一个F类一

有一些
偶
证
法去反对物质主义。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
版)
版) Hopefully, as a representative of a DUALISTIC VIEW of linguistic inquiry, sociolinguistics came into being in the 1960s and has formed an opposition to the dominant theory of Chomskyan linguistics ever since then.
语言
社会之间的密切关系早已得到认可和研究。尽管这种
法的证据可能是分散的,但可以方便地从希腊 - 罗马传统或印度历史上伟大哲学家和语法学家的作品中汲取。在整个 20 世纪,人们付出了大量努力,将语言学的研究视为对一门独立科学的一元论或自主追求。受这种语言学主流观点的强烈影响,语言的结构研究
其使用的社会语境被分离、声称、证明和加强。很明显,这种对语言学研究的僵化理解已经关闭了该领域任何更健康交流的大门。希望作为语言学研究二元论观点的代表,社会语言学于 20 世纪 60 年代应运而生,并从此
乔姆斯基语言学的主导理论形成对立。
Or does a monistic ontology such as the attribution of corporate life to the animate universe or the identification of all minds is ultimately one merely serve to explain how the phenomenon of fellow feeling is actually possible?
或者,一种一元论本体论,比如将生命归因于有生命的宇宙或认同所有心灵最终是一体的,是否只是为了解释同情现象实际上是如何可能的?
So it's neither the case that metaphysical monism in the sense of the unity of selves explains fellow-feeling, nor is it the case that when we are having fellow-feeling, that we are getting insight, knowledge of that metaphysical truth.
所以形而上学一元论意
上的自我统一并不能解释同情,也不是
当我们产生同情时,我们就能洞察到那个形而上学的真理。
I mean, ultimately, as we get to the end of this, right, he's going to embrace this hybrid picture of biological monism and spiritual pluralism, where we are, we are all these discrete spiritual substances, discrete spiritual entities, right?
我的意思是, 最终,当我们接近讨论的尾声时,他会接纳这种生物一元论
精神多元论的混合图景,在那里,我们都是这些独立的精神实体,独立的精神
在, 对吧?
And they'll say it's an unquestionable advance on the earlier monistic standpoints of Hegel, etc. Just on that same page, lower down, the metaphysical universe of life is taken for granted by leaders of thought so widely divergent.
他们会
,相较于黑格尔等早期的一元论观点, 这是一个毫无疑问的进步。就在同一页的下方,那些思想领袖们, 尽管观点大相径庭, 却都理所当然地接受了生命本体论的宇宙观。