There were a bunch of these types of invariants.

这些类型的不变量有很多。

And it's what's called a topological invariant.

也是一种拓扑不变量。

The Zola loose end was tied up, Rumlow could tell that.

朗姆洛看得出来，索拉这个不可控的变量已经不会再构成威胁。

Well, economics is not a traditional science because it is nearly impossible to control all the different variables.

经济学不是一门传统科学，因为要控制所有不同变量几乎不可能。

And yet, collected together, they have a single total amount that they spin about their center of mass.

但聚集一起时，它们有一个单一的总的不变量，他们总是围着它们的质心旋转。

We're finding what's called an " invariant" .

我们正寻找所谓的“不变量”。

So why not go down to one variable?

那为什么不减少到一个变量呢？

That was one less variable that I just don't like playing with.

那是一个我不喜欢折腾的变量。

A lorentz invariant or field theory approach.

洛伦兹不变量和场论步骤。

There is no relationship between the two variables.

两个变量之间不存关系。

How do you think things would have been had those two variables not been the case?

如果那两个变量不存的话，你觉得事情会怎样？

So, and the problem with that is you can't possibly feel God with that set of variables.

所以，于你不可能这种变量设定下感受到上帝。

Aiming for an imaginary and almost certainly false variable is just as likely to hurt as to help.

追求一个虚构且几乎肯定不存的变量，可能带来的伤害与帮助一样大。

We already know what can happen to a bridge if you don’t consider all the variables before you build one.

我们已经知道， 如果您建造桥梁之前不考虑所有变量， 桥梁会发生什么情况。

We already know what can happen to a bridge if you don't consider all the variables before you build one.

我们知道一座桥会发生什么 如果我们构建它之前不处理所有变量。

Those 500 axes represent variables that humans wouldn't even recognize or have names for, but the result is that the space has meaningful clusters.

这500个坐标轴代表了人类甚至不认识或不知道名字的变量，但结果是空间有了有意义的集群。

Observational trials are used to gather information about a particular disease or condition in a population without manipulating any of the variables.

观察性试验用于收集特定疾病或状况人群中的信息，而不操纵任何变量。

So this idea of pulling out from experience, these thinner, abstract, structural invariants, the things that we could actually do science with.

因此， 从经验中提取这些更抽象的结构性不变量的想法，这些东西是我们实际上可以用来做科学研究的。

We have a way of sort of, like, having a structural invariant of this sort of very personal experience of hot or cold.

我们有一种方式， 可以说，有一个结构不变量， 用于这种非常个人化的热或冷的体验。

So why place your confidence on something that's a variable that's not guaranteed, that can be a moving target, that may not even be fully defined yet?

那么，为什么要把信心放一个不确定的变量上呢，可能是一个移动的目标，甚至可能完全没有定义是什么？