Since then, roughly 150 lawsuits have been filed against American and foreign corporations for actions committed around the world.

从那以来，约有150起控告美国和外国公司在世界各地进权的诉讼案。

It dramatically limits the ability of plaintiffs to file suit against corporations in American courts for actions committed abroad.

（因）该判决结果大大限制了原告在美国法庭对公司在他国所犯权提起诉讼的权利。

You need solid footing and intentional torts.

你需要扎实的基础和故意权的知识。

And honestly, it's more of a defense in the publication-based privacy torts.

坦白说，这更多针对基于公开的隐私权的辩护。

That WML Water Authority V3M case is a prime example, applying battery concepts to environmental pollution.

WML水务局诉V3M案一个典型案例，将权中的“袭击”概念应用于环境污染。

And it's probably vital right at the start here to make sure we distinguish this from intentional torts.

而且在这里一开始就很关键的，必须明确区分这与故意权的不同。

So are there any court cases that really stand out as examples of how this intrusion upon seclusion port.

那么，否有某些法院案例真正脱颖而出，成展示这种入私密空间权如何运作的典范呢？

It is important to remember that not all jurisdictions recognize false light as a separate tort.

值得注意的，并非所有司法管辖区都将“虚假曝光”视一种独立的权。

Punitive damages are generally not available in contract law, except where the breach also constitutes an independent tort.

惩罚性赔偿在合同法中通常不可用，除非违约同时也构成了独立的权。

Let us begin with a broad understanding of the legal framework surrounding privacy torts.

让我们从对隐私权法框架的广泛理解开始。

This law waives the federal government's sovereign immunity for certain kinds of torts committed by its employees.

本法豁免了联邦政府对其员工所犯某些权的主权豁免。

Meeting in Geneva, the council condemned abuses by the militants, saying they may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity.

安理会在日内瓦召开会议，谴责武装分子的权，称这些可能构成战争罪和危害人类罪。

21. Won't multinationals shift production from one place to another when a nation gets too strict about infringements to fair competition?

21. 当一个国家对公平竞争的权过于严格时，跨国公司否会将生产从一个地方转移到另一个地方？

If you know the rudiments of corporate law and tort, then you will get through." " Is that book store open every day?

如果你了解公司法和权的基本知识，那么你就会度过难关。“那家书店每天都开门吗？

The foundational articulation of privacy torts comes from the influential work of William Prosser, who, in the mid-20th century, divided privacy wrongs into four distinct torts.

隐私权的基础性阐述源自威廉·普罗瑟的深远著作，他在20世纪中叶将隐私害划分四种不同的权。

And what's really, really important for us to remember right from the get-go, I think, is that each of these torts, they're protecting a different aspect of your privacy.

我认， 从一开始我们就必须牢记的，这些权中的每一种，都在保护你隐私的不同方面。

The statute grants American district courts jurisdiction over “any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or of a treaty of the United States”.

该法准许美国地区法院受理“外籍人士提出的任何违反美国法或者条约（仅限权)相关的民事诉讼”。

Allows such a case to be made because it hasn't been be so because you have to show, for example, that you had copyright and that her infringement actually caused you damages.

允许这样的案例被提出， 因之前并没有这样做过，因你必须证明你拥有版权， 并且她的权确实给你造成了损失。

It is the only way to end the suffering of millions of Venezuelans at the hands of the illegitimate regime of Nicolas Maduro and to deliver justice to the victims of the regime's horrific abuses.

这唯一的途径，可以结束千百万委内瑞拉人在尼古拉斯·马杜罗政权非法统治下所蒙受的苦难，并那些马杜罗政权可怕的权的受害者伸张正义。

In our next session, we will explore the fourth privacy tort, public disclosure of private facts, and analyze how courts distinguish it from the torts we have discussed today.

在下一节课中，我们将探讨第四种隐私权——公开私人事实（public disclosure of private facts），并分析法院如何将其与我们今天讨论的权区分开来。