Do we use the real numbers or do we approximate?

我们是还是近似值？

By the way, million is a real number.

顺便说一句，百万是一个。

There's an infinite number of floating point real numbers in the world.

世界上有无的浮点。

And then we'll do a bunch of calculations with real numbers.

然后我们会做一堆计算。

Similarly, there's a sensible notion for scaling a function by a real number.

类似地 有一个缩放函的合理念。

There was float, which is a real number with a decimal point.

有一个浮点，是一个带小点的。

Then I would finally be able to explain to my mother my art with real numbers.

然后我终于可以向妈妈解释我的艺术了。

The fact that there are no real number solutions indicates that there are no eigen vectors.

没有解的事表明没有特征向量。

I may very well get a fraction or a real number with a decimal point.

我很可能得到一个小点的。

A real number with a decimal point and some number of digits after it.

一个，后面有小点和一些字。

You can only have a finite number of values, while the normal distribution is defined over the entire real number line.

您只能拥有有限量的值，而正态布是在整个线上定义的。

So an integer or a real number you'd expect to square it and it to be a positive value or perhaps zero right?

所以对于一个整，它的平方你会认为结果是一个非负，对吗？

If we were dealing with higher orders of infinity, such as that of the real numbers, these structured strategies would no longer be possible as we have no way to systematically include every number.

如果我们处理更高级顺序的无穷，比如，这些结构策略便是不可能的，因为我们没有办法系统地包含每一个字。

But just to make this in real numbers, if I had 7 factorial over 7 minus 2 factorial, that's equal to 7 times 6 times 5 times 4 times 3 times 3 times 1.

但只是为了表示，如果我有 7 个阶乘超过 7 减 2 个阶乘， 那就等于 7 乘以 6 乘以 5 乘以 4 乘以 3 乘以 3 乘以 1。

But if vectors are not fundamentally lists of real numbers, and if their underlying essence is something more spatial, that just begs the question of what mathematicians mean when they use a word like space or spatial.

但如果向量本质上不是的列表 如果它们潜在的本质是更空间的东西 这就回避了一个问题 当学家使空间空间这个词时 他们指的是什么。