We've seen the police sort of taking away anything that could become airborne, anything that isn't really connected to the ground at this point, because there are concerns.
Well, one of the philosophers we read on this subject, Elizabeth Anderson, tries to give some—bring some philosophical clarity to the unease that Andrew articulated.
The concern is really that we will build machines that are so much more competent than we are that the slightest divergence between their goals and our own could destroy us.
Given these limitations and concerns, even if this mode of obtaining consent is to move forward, it likely won't fully protect automakers from their legal liability should the system malfunction or an accident occur.